*Ingrid
Srinath
A key
dilemma for civil society organisations (as much as for those in the public or
private sectors) is the trade-off between scale and customisation. How do we
balance the enormous need for our services with responses that address the
particular challenges confronting each individual child, family or community?
Or the choice between building, owning and managing an expensive, cumbersome
delivery system that guarantees uniform standards versus agile, flexible, local
decision-making that ensures existing public systems deliver accountably?
Between efficiency and empowerment? Between listening and prescribing?
From its very inception, CHILDLINE has achieved a remarkable balance between these conflicting priorities. Some have labeled the approach 'social franchising' but I think that term does not fully capture the model’s value or its values. In the world of business, franchising most often connotes the bland uniformity of burger and pizza chains with their limited menu choices and streamlined sourcing, production, delivery and marketing channels. Social franchising seeks to organise small, independent providers into larger units, to improve returns to scale for investments like infrastructure and communication. They aim to scale up programmes more rapidly, decrease transaction costs, provide uniform services to a broad market, collectively negotiate financial reimbursement mechanisms, and replicate best practice services among a large group.
From its very inception, CHILDLINE has achieved a remarkable balance between these conflicting priorities. Some have labeled the approach 'social franchising' but I think that term does not fully capture the model’s value or its values. In the world of business, franchising most often connotes the bland uniformity of burger and pizza chains with their limited menu choices and streamlined sourcing, production, delivery and marketing channels. Social franchising seeks to organise small, independent providers into larger units, to improve returns to scale for investments like infrastructure and communication. They aim to scale up programmes more rapidly, decrease transaction costs, provide uniform services to a broad market, collectively negotiate financial reimbursement mechanisms, and replicate best practice services among a large group.
I don’t
see that top-down, hierarchical, prescriptive approach at CHILDLINE, which was
founded as a direct response to the expressed needs of children and grounded in
respect for their rights. 17 years on, it continues to put their needs front
and centre. This is evident at every stage. From the social workers at the 24/7
phone lines to the Open Houses that reach out to children to understand their
priorities. From networks of NGOs in each city, town and district who ensure
those calls for help get the response they are owed to the ICT systems that
track quality, ensure accountability and shape policy based on authentic data
and evidence.
This week
I met a few of the NGOs who are CHILDLINE's local 'franchisees' and heard from
them of underpaid staff and volunteers scrambling to cope with spiraling
numbers of children in distress - child labourers, abandoned children, those
who have run away to escape poverty or abuse, children trafficked into the sex
trade, children being forced into early marriages, children suffering physical,
emotional and sexual abuse, children made vulnerable by disability and those
affected by HIV/AIDS. I heard too of the struggle to overcome the apathy,
inertia and bureaucratic wrangling of local authorities. I witnessed the
sometimes superhuman effort required to navigate the fragmented, dysfunctional
or simply indifferent systems we have charged with our children's protection.
What keeps them going? Is it just the rush of joy that accompanies each successful rescue and rehabilitation? Or a sense of duty that transcends all the daily travails? Passion for the well-being of children and their rights is certainly a contributing factor. As is the over-arching belief that we can and must do all we can to protect as many children as is humanly possible. Integrating that energy, dedication and commitment with state-of-the-art technology into a whole far larger than the sum of its parts are the key ingredients of the CHILDLINE model. Combined with the backing of the Ministry of Women and Children and extensive work with the police, hospitals, shelters, the justice and transport systems, among others, CHILDLINE catalyses a unique network of networks involving public, private and voluntary sectors at district, state and national levels.
What keeps them going? Is it just the rush of joy that accompanies each successful rescue and rehabilitation? Or a sense of duty that transcends all the daily travails? Passion for the well-being of children and their rights is certainly a contributing factor. As is the over-arching belief that we can and must do all we can to protect as many children as is humanly possible. Integrating that energy, dedication and commitment with state-of-the-art technology into a whole far larger than the sum of its parts are the key ingredients of the CHILDLINE model. Combined with the backing of the Ministry of Women and Children and extensive work with the police, hospitals, shelters, the justice and transport systems, among others, CHILDLINE catalyses a unique network of networks involving public, private and voluntary sectors at district, state and national levels.
In their 2006 book, The Starfish and the Spider, Ori
Brafman and Rod Beckstrom, describe the emergence of decentralised
organisations (starfish). These are characterized by distributed leadership and knowledge, open systems, flexibility and
shared power in stark contrast to the command-and-control based organisations
(spiders) of the past.
As a fan
of their work, I am amazed at how closely CHILDLINE, founded a decade before
the book was published, fits their description of the hybrid organization - one
that lies at the sweet spot between autonomy and accountability.
As anyone
who has tried to build and manage partnerships across so many diverse
interfaces knows, this isn’t easy. What CHILDLINE has proven over the past 17
years, however, is that it’s an approach that successfully resolves the
dilemmas of scale, agility, responsiveness, efficiency and empowerment.
*Ingrid
Srinath is the Executive Director of CHILDLINE India Foundation.
1 comment:
Radical Collaboration & Crowd Sourcing I think.. ...When Ramona Pierson was 22, she was hit by a drunk driver and spent 18 months in a coma. She tells the remarkable story of her recovery, drawing on the collective skills and wisdom of a senior citizens' home (Where she was dumped) at TEDxDU
http://www.ted.com/talks/ramona_pierson_an_unexpected_place_of_healing.html?quote=1252
Post a Comment